當昏哨遇上昏官

十號痴漢 於 23/09/2015 發表 收藏文章
車路士對阿仙奴的比賽掀起千重巨浪,球証甸恩的一面倒執法令人嘩然,導致超過五萬阿仙奴球迷聯署要求賽會不要再安排甸恩擔任阿仙奴賽事的裁判;哥斯達的陰濕行為亦難逃全球的錄像法眼,眾目睽睽下英足總被迫秋後算帳,最新消息是包列斯達的紅牌被撤消,哥斯達則因暴力行為被罰停賽三場。





引用http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/34329563
Arsenal's appeal against defender Gabriel's red card during Saturday's defeat by Chelsea has been successful.

Gabriel, 24, was sent off by referee Mike Dean for violent conduct after a clash with Diego Costa during the Blues' 2-0 victory at Stamford Bridge.

The successful appeal means he will now not serve a three-match suspension.

The Brazilian is subject to a separate Football Association charge of improper conduct to which he has until 18:00 BST on Thursday to respond.

That relates to him failing to leave the pitch immediately after being sent off.

Chelsea striker Costa, meanwhile, was found guilty of violent conduct and banned for three matches following a clash with Arsenal defender Laurent Koscielny.

惡棍伏法屬罪有應得,大眾應無異議。但賽會有何理據"打甩"包列斯達的紅牌? 難度是因為哥斯達的挑釁行為,才導致包列斯達的報復,所以包列斯達無罪? 包列斯達用腳踢人何嘗不是天日昭昭,眾目睽睽? 如此判決豈能令人心服口服? 說到底,包列斯達還手本身已是愚蠢及不經大腦的衝動行為,不應鼓勵,更不值得包庇;若此案成為案例,日後定必有大量上訴個案,賽會要為昏哨善後,定必忙得不可開交。為了遮掩昏哨而矯枉過正,只會為自己帶來更多麻煩。


仆街固然可恨,但以不合理手段對付仆街,只會令自己亦變成仆街。香港人,共勉之。

如果喜歡我們的文章,請即分享到︰

留言


請按此登錄後留言。未成為會員? 立即註冊
  • lurk 於 24/09/2015 評論 NO. 1

    認同

  • 博文 於 24/09/2015 評論 NO. 2

    無啦啦撤銷紅牌都唔應該 始終佢都有搞事 雖然話俾人挑釁

  • 史杜 於 24/09/2015 評論 NO. 3

    反抗都有分聰明同蠢,包列斯達就肯定係蠢果類,俾人直紅亦唔會有人同情,就算幾有道理都冇用。

  • 史杜 於 25/09/2015 評論 NO. 4

    若果甸恩真係響個報導寫佢其實睇唔到包列斯達踢人,咁大把跟進問題可以問:
    1) 甸恩用乜野理據比紅牌
    2) 甸恩響自己睇唔到嘅情況下俾紅牌,有冇違反球証守則。若有,應該點罰。
    3) 賽會既然翻睇巡邏影片判罰哥斯達,點解又會覺得包列斯達個動作唔值得俾紅牌?而家睇片唔係就係捉啲球証睇唔到嘅野架咩?

快捷鍵:←
快捷鍵:→