(有圖睇) 雲高爾忿怒了!?記者會發圖反擊艾拿戴斯

評球品足 於 11/02/2015 發表 收藏文章
loading


loading

週日曼聯賽和韋斯咸的比賽,賽後韋斯咸領隊艾拿戴斯指該場比賽的曼聯只是一支懂得長傳的球隊。然而,曼聯領隊雲高爾顯然對言論感到不滿,一而再、再而三的反擊艾拿戴斯的言論。

在週中的對般尼的賽前記者會記者會,雲高爾仍耿耿於懷,向記者展示了4張記錄了對韋斯咸一役的數據圖表,證明曼聯並非一支只懂長傳的球隊。

其中,雲高爾提到,長傳只是用盡球場的闊度,而不是直接長傳給前鋒腳下。他指出艾拿戴斯的詮釋不太好。

引用
"Yeah, long balls, in the width, to switch the play. You have to look at the data and then you will see that we did play long balls, but long balls wide, rather than to the striker."

"A ball to the forward striker is mainly called long ball play. Because I expected this question, I have made an interpretation of the data for this game and then I have to say that it is not a good interpretation from Big Sam."

雲高爾表示,韋斯咸才是長傳急攻的那一隊,因為他們有71%的長傳是向前傳送的,相反曼聯只有49%的長傳是直接向前。而他最後也霸氣地表示,要傳媒拿一份給艾拿戴斯看看。

引用"So again, they did it 71 and we 49, and I give it you, you can copy it and then maybe you can go to Big Sam and he will get a good interpretation."

詳細報導:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/managers/louis-van-gaal/11403090/Louis-Van-Gaal-hits-back-at-Sam-Allardyce-long-ball-claims-with-four-pages-of-statistics.html

請支持此Facebook專頁:https://www.facebook.com/worldsportfevertext

留言


請按此登錄後留言。未成為會員? 立即註冊
    快捷鍵:←
    快捷鍵:→